Yancai
Qiyofa
Yansay (xitoycha: {{{1}}} < SXX *ʔɨamA-sɑC < QX (mil. av. 125-yil) *ʔɨam-sɑs, boshqacha nomi 闔蘇 Xesu < *ĥa̱p-sa̱ĥ; shuningdek, Latin Abzoae bilan qiyoslang[1][2][3][4][5]) — qadimgi eron tilli koʻchmanchi davlatning xitoycha nomi.
Manbalar
- ↑ Schuessler, Axel (2014). "Phonological Notes on Hàn Period Transcriptions of Foreign Names and Words" (PDF) (Wayback Machine saytida 2019-07-14 sanasida arxivlangan). Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica (53). p. 268
- ↑ Hanshu, commentated by Yan Shigu, vol. 70 text: "師古曰:「胡廣云康居北可一千里有國名奄蔡,一名闔蘇。然則闔蘇即奄蔡也。」"
- ↑ Yu, Taishan (July 1998). "A Study of Saka History". Sino-Platonic Papers (80). http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp080_saka_sai.pdf. "Yan Shigu's 顏師古 commentary says: "Hu Guang 胡廣 adds: "Some 1,000 li to the north of Kangju was a state named Yancai, which also was named Hesu. Hence Hesu was identical with Yancai." This shows that the Yancai were also called the Hesu in the Han times."
- ↑ Pliny the Elder, Natural History IV page 365
- ↑ Hulsewé. A. F .P. (1979) China in Central Asia: The Early Stage 125 BC - AD 23: an annotated translation of chapters 61 and 96 of the History of the Former Han Dynasty. p. 129, n. 316. cited in John E. Hill. Translator's Notes 25.3 & 25.4 to draft translation of Yu Huan's Weilüe. quote: "Chavannes (1905), p. 558, note 5, approves of the identification of Yen-ts’ai with the ‘Αορσοι mentioned by Strabo, as proposed by Hirth (1885), p. 139, note 1; he believes this identification to be strengthened by the later name Alan, which explains Ptolemy’s “Alanorsi”. Marquart (1905), pp. 240-241, did not accept this identification, but Pulleyblank (1963), pp. 99 and 220, does, referring for additional support to HSPC 70.6b where the name Ho-su 闔蘇, reconstructed in ‘Old Chinese’ as ĥa̱p-sa̱ĥ, can be compared with Abzoae found in Pliny VI, 38 (see also Pulleyblank (1968), p. 252). Also Humbach (1969), pp. 39-40, accepts the identification, though with some reserve."